Definition: Now the rest of the acts of Jehoahaz, and all that he did, and his might, [are] they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 13:8. It’s a bit complex, but here's what it means in simple terms: What it says: “Now the rest of the acts of Jehoahaz, and all that he did, and his might, [are] they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?” Here’s a breakdown: “The rest of the acts…” : This refers to the entire story of Jehoahaz, a king who ruled harshly against the people of Judah. He was known for his cruelty and oppression. “…and all that he did, and his might…” : Basically, this means everything Jehoahaz did – every action he took as king – is being described. He wasn’t just doing bad things; he was actively causing harm. “Might” here refers to his power and authority. “[are] they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?” : This is the key part. The “book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel” is a record of the history, laws, and events of all the rulers of Israel. It’s like a historical document. So, what does this mean ? This verse essentially says that all of Jehoahaz's actions – his cruelty, his power, and everything he did – are being documented in the history of Israel. It’s saying that his reign was so terrible that it’s been completely lost to time. It suggests that Jehoahaz’s actions were so significant and damaging that they’ve been forgotten by the records of the kings who came after him. In a nutshell, it's an acknowledgment that Jehoahaz's reign was a dark period in Israel's history. Why is this important? This verse highlights the importance of remembering the past and learning from mistakes. It’s a reminder that even powerful rulers can cause immense harm, and that history needs to be kept accurate so we understand what happened before. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of the Bible verse? Give you a more detailed explanation of a specific aspect (like its historical context)?